Home
Abortion
End of Life Issues
Stem Cell Research
Post Abortion Healing
Gabriel Project
Pregnancy Resources
Essay Contest
Walk for Life West Coast
Respect Life
CRS
Point .7 Now!
Economic Justice
Advocacy Training
Legislative Advocacy
Catholic Lobby Day
Life & Dignity Sunday
Life Initiatives SAFE CA and Parental Notification
Advocacy
Lenten Resources
Religious Statements on the Death Penalty
Actions
Death Penalty Moratorium and Abolition Links
Victims' Family Members Links
Death Penalty Events
Movies
Myths and Facts About the Death Penalty
Additional Resources
Articles and Editorials
Recursos En Espa�ol
Pro-Life and the Catholic Campaign to End the Use of the Death Penalty
Clergy videos
Death Penalty
What is CCHD?
Our Values
Funded Groups
Grant Information
Get Involved!
Contact Us
CCHD_Upcoming_Events
CCHD
The Manhattan Declaration
Catholic Social Teaching
Health Care
Immigration
Restorative Justice
Not In Our Town
War & Peace
Environment
Other Issues
Justice & Peace
 Blog 
Thursday, 30 June 2011

 

Some truths are so self-evident their defense is hard to put into words.  Authentic marriage is one of these.  But truth lost out to social engineering last week when the New York legislature redefined the un-redefinable.  New York fell back on tired "rights" arguments.  Today we have a right to privacy, civil rights, reproductive rights, children's rights, workers' rights, gay rights, animal rights.  California's Proposition 71 made conducting stem cell research a state constitutional right.  The only rights that have fallen out of favor lately seem to be the right to life and the right to exercise religious freedom.

Proponents of same-sex marriage try to equate the right to marry someone of the same sex to the discrimination faced by African-Americans.  By doing so, they diminish the African-American struggle.  As the New York Bishops' Conference said, redefining marriage has nothing to do with civil rights.  "In the first case, a race of people was shamefully made to endure hundreds of years of slavery and systemic persecution and discrimination. Today’s debate focuses on a small group of persons, whose human rights must always be respected and defended by us all, but who claim a civil right to redefine marriage for all of society based on a private and personal preference."

Our culture seems to be moving towards a collective case of amnesia when it comes to remembering the purpose of marriage.  Marriage between a man and a woman benefits the common good.  It produces children and provides an environment where they can flourish.  It is not a private institution.  Rather it forms the bedrock on which society is built.  It was not created as "merely a committed relationship for the private interest of adults," as Federal District Judge Vaughn Walker wrote in his opinion overruling the California voters who decided that marriage is a union between one man and one woman.  Oakland Bishop Salvatore Cordileone's press release on behalf of the U.S.C.C.B. sums it up. "Making marriage law indifferent to the absence of either sex creates an institutional and cultural crisis with generational consequences yet to be seen."

Yes, actions have consequences.  If we ignore the truth and toy with matters of such enormity, we do so at our own risk.  

 

POSTED BY: Vicki Evans AT 01:43 pm   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this

Sign Guest Book  View Guest Book 

Office of Public Policy and Social Concerns
One Peter Yorke Way
San Francisco, CA 94109
Tel: 415 614-5572
All Rights Reserved ~ Copyright © 2011